Indian speakers of English tend to curl the tips of their tongues
backwards when they make the sound “t” and "d". As a result their “t”
and "d" sound a lot harder than the “t” and "d" of native English
speakers. The act of curling back the tip of the tongue in the
production of such sounds is called retroflexion. People who speak
English as a mother tongue do not curl back the tips of their tongues in
the production of "t" and "d".
To produce “t” and "d"
as a native speaker of English would, one must place the tip of one’s
tongue, without curling it backward, on the bony ridge-like projection
just above the back of the front upper teeth. This would seal off the
airflow through the mouth momentarily. It is important that the oral
passage is blocked so that when the closure is released there is an
explosion of air from the mouth. The “t” of British and American
speakers of English is a voiceless explosive sound. A voiceless sound is
one which is produced without audible vibration of the vocal cords. The
Indian “t” is also voiceless and explosive, but harder than its native
English counterpart on account of the curling back of the tip of the
tongue. The tip that is curled back is placed against the palate (the
roof of the mouth) effecting a closure of the oral tract. Then air is
released with an explosion. The "d" of British and American English is a
voiced explosive sound. A voiced sound is one that is produced with
audible vibration of the vocal cords. The Indian "d" is also voiced and
explosive, but harder than its native English counterpart as a result of
the curling back of the tip of the tongue.
Essentially
the difference between the “t” and "d" of native English and the Indian
equivalents lies not in the manner but in the place of articulation.
Both types of sounds are explosive in nature. However the tip of the
tongue is placed against the teeth ridge in the production of the native
English “t”, while the tip of the tongue is curled back against the
hard palate (the hard front portion of the palate as opposed to the soft
back portion) in the production of the Indian equivalents.
Samuel Godfrey George
No comments:
Post a Comment